Mental health: James Purnell announces employment review
Dr Rachel Perkins of South West London and St George's Mental Health Trust to head review Posted: 22 May 2009 | Subscribe Online
In a speech to the RSA, he said it was "shameful" that the employment rate for people with mental health problems was as low as 10%, compared to 73% for the general population, despite the vast majority of mentally-ill people wanting to work.
Dr Rachel Perkins, director of quality assurance and user/carer experience at the trust, who has led on this work.
Sainsbury Centre has championed model
Sainsbury Centre chief executive Angela Greatley will be speaking at a Community Care conference - New Approaches to Mental Health Care: Best practice in supporting recovery on June 18.
Sainsbury Centre pushes individual placement and support
Learning disabilities: Route into employment spelt out
For the NHS and other associated organisations to be first dealing with the issues to hand, than to impose this onto an employer, which might not have the abilities to understand or even handle complex matters, matters of health and safety come to mind as an example, the need for specialist equipment too meet the needs of the individual etc.
For the NHS and other supportive charities and organisations too improve and better the needs of the person through community support, community structures and other opportunities first before employment options are even discussed, to look at options about further and higher education whilst on JSA, if required etc.
For a change in the amounts the Department of Works and Pensions asked people to live on and to acknowledge the reality of living on the lower level of JSA and to seek employment, which clothing, appearance, travel etc. are costs incurred extra to that is needed for every day life, even for the 21st Century we still lag behind and whilst the cost of living fluctuates are still low.
For the voluntary sector too look at changing it own system of providing costs of lunch & travel allowance and to instead pay between £5-20pw according to the individual on top on his/hers benefits.
Record numbers of Britons who are suffering from terminal illnesses are queueing up for assisted suicide at the controversial Swiss clinic Dignitas, the Observer can reveal.
Almost 800 have taken the first step to taking their lives by becoming members of Dignitas, and 34 men and women, who feel their suffering has become unbearable, are ready to travel to Zurich and take a lethal drug overdose.
The tenfold increase in the number of Britons who have joined Dignitas since 2002 will raise questions about the law that bans assisted suicide in Britain.
On Tuesday, 46-year-old Debbie Purdy, who suffers from progressive multiple sclerosis, will go to the House of Lords, the UK's highest court, asking it to determine whether her husband Omar Puente will be prosecuted if he helps her to travel abroad to die.
The 34 Britons given what Dignitas calls a "provisional green light" to die have provided documentary evidence of their condition and been interviewed by both a doctor and Ludwig Minelli, the founder of Dignitas, and satisfied them that they are mentally fit to make such a decision.
One of the 34 is due to undertake an accompanied suicide very soon. Four have already secured fixed dates for their deaths, but adjourned them. The remaining 29 have not yet arranged a specific date.
A further four British people failed to get Dignitas's permission after the Swiss doctor who examines all applicants said they should not be helped, either because they did not have an incurable illness or were judged not of sound enough mind to reach such a decision.
Dignitas figures also show that 15 Britons took their lives there in 2003, 26 in 2006, eight in the first five months of 2008 and 23 in the past 12 months.
The disclosures will reopen the highly charged debate about euthanasia. This week, an influential group of peers, led by two former ministers in Tony Blair's cabinet, will seek to end what they see as the outdated and inhumane situation in which relatives or friends risk up to 14 years in prison if they travel with a loved one undertaking assisted dying overseas.
The peers - led by Lord Falconer, a former lord chancellor, and Baroness Jay, a former leader of the House of Lords - will table an amendment to the Coroners and Justice Bill in an attempt to lift the threat of prosecution from people in England and Wales who want to support someone in their final moments.
The 1961 Suicide Act criminalises anyone who aids, abets, counsels or procures someone else's suicide, and some relatives who have travelled have been questioned by police on their return. However, government law officers have already admitted that no one who goes abroad for that purpose is likely to face prosecution.
"It's a tragic anomaly that people who are giving a last loving assistance to a loved one find themselves under threat of 14 years' imprisonment if they do," Jay said last night. "Having made the very difficult decision to travel abroad to somewhere like Switzerland, where assisted dying is legal, someone would want the sort of support they would expect here from a husband, wife or loved one. The law in this area is a fudge and parliamentarians are lagging behind public opinion on this."
Prominent peers with legal or medical backgrounds are backing the move, including Lib Dem barrister Lord Lester, Baroness Greengross, the former head of Age Concern England, and Lord (Naren) Patel, chairman of the National Patient Safety Agency.
If they win - and they are increasingly confident - it would force the government to take a view. It used parliamentary procedure to prevent voting in March on an identical amendment in the Commons, which had been proposed by Patricia Hewitt, the health secretary until 2007.
Lesley Close, who travelled to Dignitas with her brother, John, in 2003 when he ended a life overshadowed by motor neurone disease, said: "More and more British people will be joining Dignitas and travelling to Switzerland to die because more people are aware of the compassionate and peaceful death you can achieve there.
"The interest in Dignitas among Britons underlines the case for reform of the law here. We need the same facility here [as Dignitas]. It's a perfectly rational and humane decision to end your life if you are suffering intolerably at the end of a terminal illness."
Sarah Wootton, chief executive of Dignity in Dying, which campaigns for a new right to assisted dying, said: "These figures show that the situation in this country is forcing people into difficult and dangerous decisions - to go abroad for an assisted death, or ask their doctor or a relative to help them die, or to attempt suicide themselves, some of which end up being botched.
"There is clearly a growing demand in this country for a well regulated, legal right for people with terminal illness, who are mentally competent, to end their life if they choose to."
http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2009/may/31/assisted-suicide-reform-uk...
The latest statistics on the world epidemic of AIDS & HIV were published by UNAIDS/WHO in July 2008, and refer to the end of 2007.
| Estimate | Range | |
|---|---|---|
| People living with HIV/AIDS in 2007 | 33.0 million | 30.3-36.1 million |
| Adults living with HIV/AIDS in 2007 | 30.8 million | 28.2-34.0 million |
| Women living with HIV/AIDS in 2007 | 15.5 million | 14.2-16.9 million |
| Children living with HIV/AIDS in 2007 | 2.0 million | 1.9-2.3 million |
| People newly infected with HIV in 2007 | 2.7 million | 2.2-3.2 million |
| Children newly infected with HIV in 2007 | 0.37 million | 0.33-0.41 million |
| AIDS deaths in 2007 | 2.0 million | 1.8-2.3 million |
| Child AIDS deaths in 2007 | 0.27 million | 0.25-0.29 million |
More than 25 million people have died of AIDS since 1981.
Africa has 11.6 million AIDS orphans.
At the end of 2007, women accounted for 50% of all adults living with HIV worldwide, and for 59% in sub-Saharan Africa.
Young people (under 25 years old) account for half of all new HIV infections worldwide.
In developing and transitional countries, 9.7 million people are in immediate need of life-saving AIDS drugs; of these, only 2.99 million (31%) are receiving the drugs.
Global trends

The number of people living with HIV has risen from around 8 million in 1990 to 33 million today, and is still growing. Around 67% of people living with HIV are in sub-Saharan Africa.
Regional statistics for HIV & AIDS, end of 2007
| Region | Adults & children living with HIV/AIDS |
Adults & children newly infected |
Adult prevalence* | Deaths of adults & children |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sub-Saharan Africa | 22.0 million | 1.9 million | 5.0% | 1.5 million |
| North Africa & Middle East | 380,000 | 40,000 | 0.3% | 27,000 |
| Asia | 5 million | 380,000 | 0.3% | 380,000 |
| Oceania | 74,000 | 13,000 | 0.4% | 1,000 |
| Latin America | 1.7 million | 140,000 | 0.5% | 63,000 |
| Caribbean | 230,000 | 20,000 | 1.1% | 14,000 |
| Eastern Europe & Central Asia | 1.5 million | 110,000 | 0.8% | 58,000 |
| North America, Western & Central Europe | 2.0 million | 81,000 | 0.4% | 31,000 |
| Global Total | 33.0 million | 2.7 million | 0.8% | 2.0 million |
* Proportion of adults aged 15-49 who were living with HIV/AIDS
During 2007 more than two and a half million adults and children became infected with HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus), the virus that causes AIDS. By the end of the year, an estimated 33 million people worldwide were living with HIV/AIDS. The year also saw two million deaths from AIDS, despite recent improvements in access to antiretroviral treatment.
Notes
Adults are defined as men and women aged 15 or above, unless specified otherwise.
Children orphaned by AIDS are defined as people aged under 18 who are alive and have lost one or both parents to AIDS.
All the statistics on this page should be interpreted with caution because they are estimates.
http://www.avert.org/worldstats.htm
http://www.statistics.gov.uk/STATBASE/ssdataset.asp?vlnk=7471
http://www.aidsmap.com/en/news/F11F49E5-63A1-4F3E-B03B-01CC78F11DC2.asp
http://www.worldmapper.org/display_extra.php?selected=374
RADAR today publishes a report of our expert seminar on Mental Health and Employment, ahead of the Government's mental health and employment strategy. It argues that:
- to reduce discrimination Government should ban pre-employment health questions, through the Equalities Bill
- national roll-out of 'individual placement and support' for people with serious mental health problems would be cost effective
- people with common mental health problems should have access to employment support whether or not they want cognitive behaviour therapy
- better guidance and training is needed on occupational health and HR practice, to raise expectations of what people with mental health problems can achieve and to promote equality.
Click here to download a copy of the report
The perception of people on benefits as "scroungers" is as deep-rooted as ever, while there is broad public tolerance of the wealthy even in a recession, research has found.
A report published today by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation (JRF) and the Fabian Society says that despite government antipoverty drives, most people believe high incomes are fair and based on effort, while people on low incomes largely deserve to be poor. The financial crisis has produced greater distaste for the "super rich" but has had no impact on wider attitudes to the income gap between rich and poor, the report claims. Echoing the Victorian concept of the "deserving" and "undeserving" poor, negative perceptions of benefit claimants were countered by strong sympathy for the working poor and for groups such as carers.
A separate study by the Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR), also commissioned by JRF, concluded that politicians were skewing the debate around poverty and income inequality by focusing on the very poor while ignoring the gap between the extremely wealthy and everyone else. Politicians of all parties cannot decide whether the policy priority should be overall economic prosperity or reducing levels of income inequality, it argues. The Fabian research uncovered marked differences among the public as to what, if any, the government's role should be in reducing social inequality.
Messages about barriers to equality of opportunity are failing to get through, according to the research, with 69% of people believing that climbing the social scale is down to individual effort and that there are plenty of opportunities for those willing to take them. It also found that most people, regardless of earnings, defined themselves as in the middle of the income spectrum and saw the "income gap" primarily as something between the middle and the super rich.
Despite negative perceptions of poorer people, however, there was strong underlying support for a progressive tax system. The research identified a public appetite for "more radical action on pay and taxation at the top of the spectrum".
It concluded that as the credit crisis unfolded the government could have gone further than its move to increase income tax to 45% for those earning more than £150,000. It also reported support for tough measures to curb excesses in corporate pay as a result of the financial crisis.
However, in a sign that Labour's redistributive tax policies such as child tax credits were doing little to shift attitudes, most people on middle incomes complained that the system was less generous to them than other groups.
"Participants routinely drew on negative stereotypes of benefit recipients," the report's authors concluded.
An entrenched belief in "deserved inequality" was a major obstacle to convincing the public about the benefits of redistributive tax or the merits of equality generally, they said. The report warned that the government and anti-poverty campaigners could miss an "important opportunity" to capitalise on recent changes in attitudes in the wake of the credit crisis if they did not begin building "a more profound consensus for tackling inequality".
Brendan Barber, general secretary of the TUC, said that politicians across the spectrum had made little effort to challenge or change ingrained negative attitudes around poverty.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2009/jun/22/benefits-income-poverty-fa...
One of the UK's most influential businessmen believes that companies must do more to employ former crack and heroin addicts - even in the jaws of a recession.
In an article posted today on the Commentisfree website, John Varley, chief executive of Barclays, argues that big business can play a crucial role in helping former addicts and homeless people on the path to rehabilitation.
Varley, who is president of the Employers' Forum on Disability and the UK Drug Policy Commission, the independent body that collects evidence on the harm caused by drugs, urges companies not to turn their backs on former users as the economy falters.
"It might seem like an unusual time to be asking ourselves how we can do more to engage with disadvantaged groups, such as recovering drug users or the homeless," he writes. "But they should remain on our mind because if, as employers, we turn our backs on these groups we are accumulating problems for the future, with implications for the long-term recovery of both individuals and the economy."
His comments are likely to trigger a national debate on the merits of employing former addicts. It is not known how many "clean" former addicts there are in the UK. However, it is estimated there are about 400,000 heroin and crack users and some 80% of them are not in jobs.
The cost to the taxpayer is immense. A report by the Department for Work and Pensions suggests that up to 240,000 problem users in England alone may be receiving out-of-work benefits - representing about 7% of those receiving jobseeker's allowance or incapacity benefit.
A study by the Drug Policy Commission found that two-thirds of employers would not recruit a former heroin or crack cocaine user, even if otherwise suitable for the job. And those that would do so usually operate an arbitrary "two years' drug-free" rule.
But Varley suggests former users can make good employees. "Research from Business Action on Homelessness and the UK Drug Policy Commission shows that, despite common perceptions, many homeless people and those with a history of addiction are highly motivated to work (and most have worked), and their loyalty and commitment is typically very noticeable," he writes. "That's because, for them, it is not just a job but a real indication that they are getting their lives back on track. A job can provide a new identity, a new social circle and increased self-esteem - in short, a fresh start."
There will be doubts about the merits of giving jobs to former users at a time when unemployment is rising significantly, but Varley, whose bank employs some 155,000 people across 50 countries, claims there are benefits from making a commitment to the most vulnerable in society.
"During an economic downturn (but particularly a severe one like this) there is a risk that we simply adopt a 'charity begins at home' stance, and shift our focus away from those on the margins of society. Yet I have seen first hand the real benefits (both for employer and employee) for those who are prepared to hire suitable candidates from the widest possible pools of talent (including the disadvantaged)."
Varley's comments have been backed by leading drug charities. "We hope that it encourages other employers to recognise that they can help someone sustain recovery from addiction and in the process acquire loyal employees," said Nick Barton, chief executive of Action on Addiction.
"Work has been shown to be an important component of rehabilitation and reintegration into society, helping to reduce the incidence of relapse. We have a number of positive examples from our Working Recovery programme, which has been helping people for more than 10 years."
The programme provides a bridge between treatment and recovery by teaching vocational skills.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2009/jul/05/drug-rehabilitation-barclays


http://www.statistics.gov.uk/Cci/nscl.asp?ID=6328
http://www.statistics.gov.uk/cci/nugget.asp?id=1092
http://www.statistics.gov.uk/Cci/nscl.asp?ID=6327
http://www.heartstats.org/datapage.asp?id=722
http://www.urban75.com/Drugs/drugdeath.html
http://www.statistics.gov.uk/Cci/nscl.asp?ID=7464
http://www.statistics.gov.uk/statbase/Product.asp?vlnk=618
http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2009/jan/27/suicide-alcohol-related-de...
http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/325/7357/191