Skip to main content

Blogs

News, events, announcments

Election manifesto highlights

Thought I would share some of my current thoughts .....

15/07/2009 12:42

I've had some good conversations lately with many people over what faces us as a community over the coming years. Is HIV going to loose its "specialised" commissioning status? As you may or may not know funding for HIV into clinics and hospitals is to a certain extent 'ring fenced' as it meets the definition of a 'complex' medical issue.  If funding for HIV becomes non-specialist in terms of its funding this means, locally, it will have to fight with other health issues such as diabetes for funding. Of course how much a local hospital or Primary Care Trust will give the HIV service provision will be influenced by local factors. This raises many issues on the quality of continuing care, access to treatments etc.

I also remain extremely concerned with the proposed introduction of treatment tarrif's. Combined with the above it raises further issues placing funding before care.

We have seen as evidenced by postings on here how much social care provision has depleted for PLWHA (People Living With HIV/AIDs). Accessing community care has become increasing more difficult.  Some initial statistics prove worrying and we are trying to get some comparative data to get a handle on how bad it is.

No meaning to sound like a well known comedy but I believe in local services, provided by local people for local people.  Funding for the HIV third sector is becoming increasingly tight and we are seeing the demise of good local services.  It may be that we have too many HIV groups providing advocacy and services and we as a sector need to come together more.  Either way HIV is not as high on the political agenda as it once was. Yes you hear about the international picture but in the UK it is extremely difficult to get exposure on our issues.  A belief by the civil service that really HIV/AIDS is now "sorted" and of course these same people advising decision makers in the form of ministers.

The lauded "Right to Control" part of welfare reform would have been and was seen as a very positive step forward for disabled people. However since the green paper the key components that would have delivered radical and empowering powers for disabled people has been so watered down by government the bill will end up achieving little and certainly may in fact may it more not less difficult for disabled people to have more control with less "red tape".  From the forums I have been to it is now seen as dis-empowering.

At time of writing our saving grace has been the Lords who are amending the welfare bill thus delaying its final passage. Our hope is that if government want this passed there will be more concessions on the bill and a move back towards the initial promises.

The Equality Bill is in progress and very important. As with most problems there is a scope of law to be applied. Problems with benefits may bring in several separate acts and thus you need to try and keep a handle on what is happening.  We have and will continue to be active on this especially arguing our case where possible.

The tightening of "belts" in the NHS, Funding etc .. means a tougher time ahead. Some of the changes will be innovative in nature to cope and I hope the long term prognosis will be positive for us. However I am only too aware that we must keep up with the changes to ensure that our issues are not compromised in this financial climate.

The Chelsea & Westminster is going to expand its HIV service provision with new building and an increase in the size of the dedicated HIV ward and day care centre. The plans will make for a 'model' environment for people who need to be in hospital because of their HIV.  This is encouraging.

Well I have rambled on for a bit. Thank you for reading and as always I wish you well.



John. 

Lady GaGa visits HIV Charity Body Positive North West.

"Two faced Civil Servants" - News of the World

Posted in
22/06/2009 09:11

As you can imagine I get various news feeds concerning the Department for Work & Pensions.  This story caught my eye, its main topic is immigration and the Home Office, but you have to wonder if the same goes on throughout all divisions including disability benefits.

From the News of the World, 20th June 2009

"CIVIL servants have revealed how they SKIVE OFF work and MOCK immigrants — in a flood of astonishing messages on chat website Facebook.

 

 
 

Cabinet Reshuffle.

Posted in
05/06/2009 16:24

An important time as it is likely those ministers placed today will lead the charge on government policy into the next election. We have covered this in the forums as it is important that you know who is responsible for key areas of your life whether you access health services or state benefit services.

For me it is another "throw of the dice" to try and raise the issues you have mentioned & I naturally share over the last few years with new people, we will always do this. "To fell a tree takes several strikes of the axe."

Personally I am not unhappy with the disappearance of people who in the main I believe have been more self-serving than country serving. This is my view and of course you are fully entitled to disagree and I welcome any comments you have, as always.

I hope you voted yesterday and with your head and not your heart, as we were all tempted to do including myself.  Knowing the issues our community face, living them myself I am extremely angry at the headlines of abuse of the spirit of the expenses system. Especially when if you are HIV+ you face a difficult time trying to keep your head above the water-line fighting for what you maybe entitled to.

 

MP's expenses continues

Posted in
27/05/2009 16:05

It can become very disheartening with the expenses scandal rolling on. MP's spending habits surreal when cast against the amount of money those with disabilities have to live off. Clearly the moral authority has gone with the likes of James Purnell avoiding paying tax, must be nice to be in that position whilst controlling the destinies of those more vulnerable.

There are some elections coming up and the temptation is to vote with the heart out of anger rather than with the head.  I would urge you to vote and vote according to your principals.  The local council and European elections will not "get rid" of any standing MP that comes at general election time.

Don't get upset, don't get disheartened.  It is difficult but we are all in the same boat.  Our politics are changing and now more than ever is the time to get writing urging your MP or potential MP for their positions on the issues that matter to you. 

Unions mark International Day against Homophobia 17th May 2009.

Posted in

UNICEF at the House of Commons - Preventing HIV with young people.

12/05/2009 16:02

A good presentation in committee room 3 at Parliament yesterday by UNICEF. They were presenting their report "Preventing HIV with young people: the key to tackling the epidemic".  

An interesting discussion with UNICEF Chief of HIV/AIDS programme division. New York  Jim Kolker talking about the situation in Africa and some of the good progress made in terms of preventing mother to child infection.

Dr. Nina Ferencic was presenting the issues in Eastern Europe and Asia started by reminding the audience that AIDS/HIV and its issues are not just African based, albeit the difficulties that exist there.  She spoke about the former Russian states and the lives lived by children who as well as having HIV are often drug users & involved in the sex industry. Heavily stigmatised with no political or celebrity champions it is an uphill battle.

David Burrows the Chair of the APPG HIV/AIDS informed the meeting of the events mentioned by Neil Gerrard about children in the UK.

I had an oppourtunity to speak to some of the members of the Lords & Commons afterwards. I mentioned the situation in Northern Ireland relating the information passed to me by Tony Bell.  It seems that even within the United Kingdom boarders, HIV is more heavily stigmatised in certain regions than others. Getting local political support difficult for many reasons least of all personally held discriminations.

On questioner asked the UNICEF delegation about criminalisation.  The response was the same as given by UNAIDS at a similar meeting last year. That they were strongly opposed to this as it not only fertilised stigma but placed another barrier to people who would otherwise be tested.

Often we take for granted the services we have, we don't often stand up and fight where we should when those services are lost.  I know living in London I am somewhat better placed than those who live in other parts of the country. I alarms me that there is sometimes a huge disparity in services offered and the delivery of same up and down the UK. I hear about it every day. I am grateful to those who email me as it centres my thinking and comment on the differences in the various meetings I attend.

Thanks to Baroness Northover who hosted the event.

I would draw your attention to the UNICEF Unite for Children campaign for a "Patent Pool" to help develop child based medications. Click here if you want to know more or sign the petition.

MP Expenses

Posted in
10/05/2009 14:49

Its been quite a week now that we have been able to have an insight into how those who make the policy's which affect our ability to live from day to day have been expensing lavish life styles. Avoiding Capital Gains Tax on the sale of properties, changing the designation of "second homes" it seems at a whim. A lack of consistency in designating homes depending on which organisation the MP is engaged with, avoiding tax liabilities.

When we make a claim for public money in the form of benefits, we are forensically examined to prove eligibility and often we have to prove entitlements repeatedly.

It is not that I mind legitimate expenses being met but I have to say if this behaviour was transferred to the benefits system I suspect many would face the inside of a court room.  Remember MP expenses is also public money.

This is not party specific issues, no doubt in the fulness of time. MP's from other parties will face the same media scruitiny.

However government has a specific duty to be seen to be "whiter than white" using public taxes for the public good.  A dependance on the rules as an excuse lacks integrity. Members of the commons are often referred to as "the honourable member" and ministers gain the title "Right Honourable" implying a behaviour expected.

The rules may allow wide interpretation BUT will any claim within the rules be seen as honourable?

It seems from the Sunday newspapers that Inland Revenue are going to look at the tax issues.

James Purnell's profit on the sale of his flat will be one of many tax avoiding property profiteering activities looked at.

He is not alone in the Department for Work and Pensions though. Tony McNulty, one of his ministers has been referred to the Police over his claims and it seems Kitty Ussher is also under the "microscope" for the £20,000 spent refitting her second home within 12 months of being an MP.

£20,000 would pay the benefits for one disabled person to live on the poverty line under current rates.

Engaging as we do with the DWP we know that equity is merely a concept when it comes to the assessment of entitlement. Is is any wonder?

Guardian

Independent

Daily Mail.

 

If this was a Housing Benefit claim would it be Fraud? James Purnell Housing Allowance.

Posted in
05/05/2009 08:07

Rt. Hon James Purnell, MP. Secretary of State  Department for Work & Pensions. Has been in the news this weekend over the payment of his parliamentary housing allowance. It seems that the minister claimed more than his rent and his ex-fiancee having also contributed to the rental payment left most of this claimed housing allowance in his pocket.

As the minister in charge of the Welfare Benefits system. I am wondering if someone over claimed on their Housing Benefit would not face the inside of a court room?

Of course this is all Public Money and I doubt the minister faced the same investigations as those claiming Housing Benefit in justifying his claim for Housing Allowance.

You can read about the story by clicking on the links below.

Daily Express Online

Times Online

Telegraph Online

Have a good May Day Bank Holiday ALL!

01/05/2009 14:46

Secretary of State DWP James Purnell and the "Messy flat" story.

Posted in
27/04/2009 18:20

James Purnell seems to have been the target of a story concerning the state of a flat he no longer rents. Claiming £1600.00 in expenses for cleaning and such like.

You can read the story here in the Telegraph. 

Sexually Transmitted Diseases - Greater London - DOH Written Answer

Posted in
23/04/2009 17:29

 From www.theyworkforyou.com



 

Photo of Sarah TeatherSarah Teather (Brent East, Liberal Democrat) | Hansard source

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many people were diagnosed with a sexually-transmitted infection in each London health trust area in each of the last five years.





 

Photo of Dawn PrimaroloDawn Primarolo (Minister of State (Public Health), Department of Health; Bristol South, Labour) | Hansard source

Data on the number of diagnoses of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in genitourinary medicine (GUM) clinics is only available by strategic health authority (SHA). The following table gives the number of diagnoses of STIs in GUM in the London SHA between 2003 and 2007, the latest year for which figures are available.

  2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
New STI diagnoses(1) 90,791 92,014 89,823 89,704 96,223
Other STI diagnoses(1) 68,954 73,072 76,386 72,652 79,607
Total STI diagnoses 159,745 165,086 166,209 162,356 175,830
(1) Includes diagnoses defined the in notes 5 and 6 to the following table
Notes:
1. The data available from the KC60 statutory returns are for diagnoses made in GUM clinics only. Diagnoses made in other clinical settings, such as General Practice, are not recorded in the KC60 dataset.
2. The data available from the KC60 statutory returns are the number of diagnoses made, not the number of patients diagnosed.
3. The information provided has been adjusted for missing clinic data.
4. Data are unavailable for 2008.
5. New STI diagnoses include: Chlamydial infection (uncomplicated and complicated), Gonorrhoea (uncomplicated and complicated), Infectious syphilis, Genital Herpes, simplex (first attack), Genital warts (first attack), New 
HIV diagnosis, Non-specific genital infection (uncomplicated and complicated), Chancroid/lymphogranuloma venerum (LGV)/Donovanosis, Molluscum contagiosum, Trichomoniasis, Scabies, Pediculus pubis.
6. Other STI diagnoses include: Early latent, congenital and other acquired syphilis, Recurrent genital Herpes simplex, Recurrent and re-registered genital warts, Subsequent 
HIV presentations (including AIDS), Ophthalmia neonatorum (chamydial or gonococcal), Epidemiological treatment of suspected STIs (syphilis, Chlamydia, gonorrhoea, non-specific genital infection).
Source:
Health Protection Agency, KC60 returns

In addition to STIs diagnosed in GUM clinics, the National Chlamydia Screening Programme (NCSP) provides Chlamydia screening to asymptomatic people under the age of 25 years of age in England. The NCSP was launched in 2003, when a phased implementation started. The following table shows the number of diagnoses made of Chlamydia in patients between the ages of 15-24 years between 

1 April 2003  and 

31 December 2008  London Primary Care Trusts (PCTs).

Area 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Barking and Dagenham PCT 0 (1) (1) 16 26 284
Barnet PCT 10 10 30 37 71 154
Bexley PCT 0 11 22 31 32 254
Brent Teaching PCT 6 11 83 121 110 175
Bromley PCT 0 53 77 83 87 237
Camden PCT 53 99 105 126 149 170
City and Hackney Teaching PCT 13 15 32 30 263 402
Croydon PCT 0 35 51 92 102 296
Ealing PCT (1) (1) 14 46 24 94
Enfield PCT 0 19 135 134 121 166
Greenwich Teaching PCT 0 63 66 97 98 465
Hammersmith and Fulham PCT (1) 5 16 38 33 54
Haringey Teaching PCT 9 21 66 80 150 169
Harrow PCT 0 (1) 77 69 98 127
Havering PCT 0 0 14 46 33 127
Hillingdon PCT (1) (1) 19 40 30 150
Hounslow PCT (1) (1) 10 28 63 106
Islington PCT 50 115 84 101 141 221
Kensington and Chelsea PCT (1) 8 9 26 20 49
Kingston PCT 0 0 11 17 19 81
Lambeth PCT (1) 232 373 535 572 621
Lewisham PCT (1) 611 730 859 881 1,025
Newham PCT (1) 11 9 29 28 335
Redbridge PCT (1) (1) 15 24 33 248
Richmond and Twickenham PCT (1) 0 (1) 18 38 68
Southwark PCT (1) 333 415 582 691 713
Sutton and Merton PCT 0 (1) 20 82 46 165
Tower Hamlets PCT (1) 8 19 28 103 274
Waltham Forest PCT 7 (1) 11 32 40 247
Wandsworth PCT (1) 7 38 71 55 122
Westminster PCT 6 20 21 35 44 69
             
London SHA 185 1,711 2,580 3,553 4,201 7,668
(1) Cell size of 1 to 4 has been masked to protect deductive disclosure in accordance with Office of National Statistics guidelines.
Notes:
1. The NCSP has been phased in since 2003 with all 152 PCTs reporting data to the programme since March 2008. Therefore note that numbers of diagnoses have risen substantially as an increasing proportion of the target population have been tested.
2. NSCP data are presented by 
PCT of residence.
3. The data from the NCSP Core Dataset are for Chlamydia screens conducted within the NCSP outside of GUM clinics only.
4. The data available from the NCSP are the number of diagnoses made and not the number of patients diagnosed.
5. Data includes Chlamydia tests for males, females, and those with unknown/unspecified sex.
6. Data presented are based on tests with confirmed positive diagnoses only.
Source:
National Chlamydia Screening Programme Core Dataset

 

 

Blog is back - I certainly missed it. So the budget .....

Posted in
23/04/2009 17:04

So we had a budget yesterday, higher taxes for the rich, cuts in public services in the future not a happy picture.  Its great that government is giving more to disabled children and to pensions.

However with an increasing welfare bill moving forward and the changes in the pipeline (the move from Incapacity Benefit to Employment & Support Allowance) we need to be vigilant and ensure that fairness for HIV+ people who are so disadvantaged especially in the work arena are not forgotten.  Money in the public sector is going to become tighter, many more claiming from a finite "pot".  

Extra funding for Job Centre Plus and the job creation scheme is welcome in so much as lets hope some of this translates into some training on the issues facing HIV+ people and to overcome the barriers they also face in returning to work.

Healthcare is also of concern. With cuts to healthcare budgets we need to ensure that healthcare providers treat HIV properly. ThCell isn't involved directly in the delivery of HIV healthcare, there are many people who campaign on all of our behalf here who are very knowledgeable but we must support their efforts where we can.  Clearly our concern is with funding and priority to HIV & Mental Health, HCV and our desire for sexual equality in the HPV vaccination program for boys as well as girls (and Gardasil for both).

The everyday services that people with HIV may need and have been diminishing over the last decade are our concern and in the current climate we aim to ensure we are again treated equitably.

Yes the blog is back. I missed the "dialogue" nature of being able to chat about the issues.  

 

 

End of the blog moving to Forum's ...

Posted in
27/08/2008 22:00

Various blog applications have been helpful since day one of this "campaign". However thinking of what and where we want to be in future & the structure of the website.

We will be undertaking a move of the blog content into the Forum's Section over the next month or so.  

New posts and information from tomorrow will be posted into the Forum Section.  

You will of course be able to post your comments anywhere and we will move them at the appropriate time.

This will be the second and final move of the blog as we are now going to follow a standard model for all our sites.

Why are we doing this?.

Syndicate content